ORGP-6010 Research Methods and Analysis in Organizational Psychology

Module 1 Reading and Resources

Required Text:

Weathington, B. L., Cunningham, J. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2010), Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 1-4 

M1 Lecturette

Moe, R. (2017, March 31). What is social science research? - Academic Research Foundations: Quantitative. LinkedIn. 

M1 Discussion 1

Optional References:

Dasen, P. R. (2022). Culture and Cognitive Development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(7–8), 789–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221092409

Ward, B. (2022). Resolving the Raven Paradox: Simple Random Sampling, Stratified Random Sampling, and Inference to Best Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 89(2), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2021.26

M1 Discussion 2

Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., & Böhm, R. (2022). Bending Our Ethics Code: Avoidable Deception and Its Justification in Psychological Research. European Psychologist, 27(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000431

Hoffman, W. M., Frederick, R. E., & Schwartz, M. S. (2014). Business Ethics : Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Milner, J., Milner, T., McCarthy, G., & da Motta Veiga, S. (2023). Leaders as Coaches: Towards a Code of Ethics. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59(3), 448–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863211069408

Rauvola, R. S., & Reddy, M. (2023). Improving conditions or conditional improvements? A modern code, and mode, of I-O ethics. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.15

Sharpe, D., & Ziemer, J. (2022). Psychology, ethics, and research ethics boards. Ethics & Behavior, 32(8), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.2023019

Watts, L. L., Lefkowitz, J., Gonzalez, M. F., & Nandi, S. (2023). How relevant is the APA ethics code to industrial-organizational psychology? Applicability, deficiencies, and recommendations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.112

M1 Discussion 3

Optional References:

Charli, M. S., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L. (2022). [Rev. of Learning How Research Design Methods Work: A Review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches]. Qualitative Report, 27(12), 2956–2960. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901

Peters, D. (2023). Wellbeing Supportive Design - Research-Based Guidelines for Supporting Psychological Wellbeing in User Experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2965–2977. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2089812

M1 Assignment

Fine, C., Sojo, V., & Lawford‐Smith, H. (2020). Why Does Workplace Gender Diversity Matter? Justice, Organizational Benefits, and Policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 36–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12064

Ian Hajnosz and Wesley Ganz (2017) "Gender, Attitudes, and Behaviors: an Analysis of Contemporary Sexism," SUURJ: Seattle University Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/suurj/vol1/iss1/9

Kaşdarma, E. (2023). Investigation of the Causes for Negative Attitudes towards Women Incompatible with Gender Stereotypes within the Context of Social Identity Theory. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşimlar, 15(2), 296–306.

Krishna, A., Kim, S., & Shim, K. (2021). Unpacking the Effects of Alleged Gender Discrimination in the Corporate Workplace on Consumers’ Affective Responses and Relational Perceptions. Communication Research, 48(3), 426–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218784483

Socratous, M. (2020). Eliminating Gender Discrimination in the Workplace through Gender Neutrality. Market, 1, 57–110.